(I played around with the latest versions of software libraries, and found out, that the problem was an outdated ufraw version. 0.18 does work. I just post this for anybody who might run into the same problem…)
With version 6.6.5.6 (currently the stable release on Gentoo) I receive this error ...
Search found 3 matches
- 2011-04-04T18:40:44-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Samsung's raw format (SRW)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 21991
- 2011-04-04T16:44:17-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Samsung's raw format (SRW)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 21991
Re: Samsung's raw format (SRW)
Here are three photos I took (with my Samsung WB2000) some weeks ago:
SAM_0440.SRW ( JPG version )
SAM_0585.SRW ( JPG version )
SAM_0901.SRW ( JPG version )
(total: 85 MB)
Additionally there are some other images: http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/samsung_nx10_review/sample_images ...
SAM_0440.SRW ( JPG version )
SAM_0585.SRW ( JPG version )
SAM_0901.SRW ( JPG version )
(total: 85 MB)
Additionally there are some other images: http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/samsung_nx10_review/sample_images ...
- 2011-04-04T13:01:20-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Samsung's raw format (SRW)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 21991
Samsung's raw format (SRW)
Dear ImageMagick developers,
I was wondering, if you intend to implement a coder for Samsung's (rather new) SRW file format.
The format seems to be a "Samsungnized" TIFF, used for raw images. (See: http://metadatamadness.blogspot.com/2010/03/stupid-samsung-srw.html and http://metadatamadness ...
I was wondering, if you intend to implement a coder for Samsung's (rather new) SRW file format.
The format seems to be a "Samsungnized" TIFF, used for raw images. (See: http://metadatamadness.blogspot.com/2010/03/stupid-samsung-srw.html and http://metadatamadness ...