Search found 3 matches
- 2013-08-04T11:55:41-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21829
Re: normcrosscorr
Tried on screenshot, it's ok. Is white so hardly abuses normalization of an image? I can handle amount of white and use -subimage-search
- 2013-08-03T12:56:28-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21829
Re: normcrosscorr
Thx for reply, here is my code. It's not ok even without blur.
# convert wizard: wizard.png
# convert wizard.png -crop 150x50+130+80 +repage subwizard.png
# ./normcrosscorr -s subwizard.png wizard.png corr.png | tail -n 2
Echo:
Match Coords: (168,326) And Score In Range 0 to 1: (0.0943717 ...
# convert wizard: wizard.png
# convert wizard.png -crop 150x50+130+80 +repage subwizard.png
# ./normcrosscorr -s subwizard.png wizard.png corr.png | tail -n 2
Echo:
Match Coords: (168,326) And Score In Range 0 to 1: (0.0943717 ...
- 2013-08-02T02:53:14-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21829
normcrosscorr
This issue applies to normcrosscorr script at http://www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/normcrosscorr/
Firstly, there should be
std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard-deviation]" info:`
instead of
std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard_deviation]" info:`
Secondly, i don't understand why if i ...
Firstly, there should be
std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard-deviation]" info:`
instead of
std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard_deviation]" info:`
Secondly, i don't understand why if i ...