Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

There might be a reason for it, rows-per-strip is a required field. See: http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/tiff/index.html#spec You can also have a look under coders/tiff.c (source file) Using: #!/bin/bash convert -size 100x100 xc:white -units PixelsPerInch \ -set tiff:artist "my_Artist ...

Oops! was not... Version used: ImageMagick-6.8.8-8~beta20140222.zip and ImageMagick-6.8.8-8.tar.bz2 just in case they were different? After compiling under linux /usr/local/bin/convert -version Version: ImageMagick 6.8.8-8 Q16 x86_64 2014-02-23 http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: Copyright (C ...

I can confirm that using -set comment "something" works. As well as +set comment. What does not works is everything related to any of the tiff: properties. If you use convert -size 100x100 xc:white -units PixelsPerInch -define tiff:rows-per-strip=100 -density 400 -depth 8 ^ -type Bilevel -colorspace ...

rose: ( with : ) is an internal IM stored image. I know, but i forgot that I was not actually writing the image. If you do, you get the actual filename. My bad. I do not believe there is any +define. What about: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#define Use +define key to ...

Removing the property with an external tool works but i wanted to avoid that. It's not really practical when you have tens of thousand images. Not counting the ones that were sent to clients (over 1 million), some don't care but others do. That's how i discovered that "feature" :shock: The -strip ...

Hello to all, first time poster here. Versions of ImageMagick used: Windows: ImageMagick 6.8.7-0-Q8-x64-dll Windows: ImageMagick 6.8.8-7-Q16-x86-dll Linux: ImageMagick 6.7.8-8 2013-03-18 Q16 I have been searching the forums and found one reference to my problem: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse ...