Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

I'd like to split an image into each color and every color that is darker, so that this becomes black and everything else white.

I see I can get the colormap with identify, so what I would like to extract each one of these colors into a separate image, but also include all darker colors, e.g. I want RGB(242,255,0) and darker to be black, and all else white (and then do this for each color on the colormap to get hundreds of separate images.)

I thought that I might be able to define a darker color as any that has a lower RGB value (multiplying or adding the RGB elements together), but now I'm not so sure as yellow would then be darker than blue, but that's not logical.

So I have 2 questions:
1. How can I extract the colors into separate B&W images as explained above?
2. Is there any standard on how to consider whether one color is 'darker' than another?

Thanks!

For definitions of "darker", see http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... #intensity

Windows syntax: This:
- reads the built-in image "rose:", but you should use your own file
- makes a copy, turning all the pixels to the chosen colour
- converts both images to greyscale
- subtracts this from the original. Now pixels that were the chosen colour or darker are black.
- changes all non-black pixels to white.

Thank you very much for your help.

Unfortunately I get this error testing your code. Am I doing something wrong?

I am on Linux if that makes a difference.

With Linux you need to escape the ( and ) so it becomes /( and /) or is it \( and \) ?

OK, now I'm getting a different error:

I do not think "rgb(242,255,0)" this needs the quotes but it needs the \ so rgb\(242,255,0\)

alasdairdf wrote:convert: unrecognized option `-grayscale'

What version IM are you using? If before 6.8.something, I suggest you upgrade.

I can't upgrade, I'm using 6.7.7-7 and I need this exact version as it contains a specific bug fix which then broke again in the next version. This was the version magick did to fix the bug-fix and it is the only version that works.

Bonzo, either works. The problem is with -grayscale.

Instead of "-grayscale Rec709Luminance", you could use "-colorspace Gray".

I do not think "rgb(242,255,0)" this needs the quotes but it needs the \ so rgb\(242,255,0\)

quoting "rgb(242,255,0)" works fine on Unix. I use that rather than escapes. It may be better since it will allow spaces between commas.

Instead of "-grayscale Rec709Luminance", you could use "-colorspace Gray".

OK, thanks. But is this identical or is "-grayscale Rec709Luminance" going to give better results? It's possible that I could install two different versions of IM and use a newer version for this and the older version for when I need that, but I would only want to do that if I really do need a newer version for better results on this argument.

Thank you for all your help!

alasdairdf wrote:But is this identical or is "-grayscale Rec709Luminance" going to give better results?

Did you read the link I supplied?

Typically the linear Rec709Luminance formula is used, which is the same formula used when converting images to -colorspace gray.